portal is simply fantastic, mac does have a right click, what moron thoght they diddnt? retard. and the ending is great! the whole game is a massive challange and somehow they managed to have a boss fight even though you dont have a weapon. oh and one more thing, the cake is NOT a lie put on a no walls cheat and you can find the room with the cake it also has the weighted companion cube
set the output to a .mov its an uncompressed format and will therefore require less to render out. WMV is a HIGHlY compressed format and will require more power than you need. after the .mov output, try and open the OUTPUTTED file in vegas on its own, and render that as a wmv. i think you'l find that should work
we're getting hung up on things that dont matter. the whole point of this thread is to discuss how good (or otherwise) reach is. not the inadequacies of the xbox 360. thats a conversation for another thread.
you're right and wrong there, gamespot said that basicaly the only thing wrong with H2 were its graphics, but it was also way ahead of many other xbox games of the time. as for H3 many (me included) think that the graphics were great, but others (those who like cod) will say that the graphics are lacking (mainly because halo dosent have random bits of paper flying around... yeah nice) as for reach, i (and my cod playing friends) all agree it is brilliant now. better than cod and odst... great
there need to be a hell of a lot of tweaks, many of which we have discussed here. if somebody is happy to create a list of these i will post them on bungie.net. its the whole point of the beta anyway, too many people (perhaps me included at times) are judging this as a game when it is just a test. anyway, if you guys will give me lists, i will post them
we really dont. there will easily be 10 of these, with the same programs, all just as pointless as eachother. the problem with them is that all the tools are readily available, why collect them when realisticaly you only need 3 or 4 tools in order to mod fucking halo 3 (why isn't that well and truly dead yet) and yet all of these stupid AIO's have like 200mb of bloated shit just to waste space and never get used. if people want to make programs, MAKE NEW PROGRAMS. dont just collect other peoples work and expect a cookie and a hug. it makes you a fag who wants credit for other peoples work and research. go fuck yourselves. peace
just a quick poll to see what you all think im in two minds... i love the new graphics but i think its WAY over powered and the new powers are ridiculous. lets see
im just saying. making an app thats just a collection of other peoples work... great. you can clearly code (congrats) so use it constructively! build a resigner, or a new modding tool... something new re-engineering what we already have has been done to death. i fail to see the point
whats the spec of your netbook and what actualy is it? i had an advent 4211 (msi wind clone) and with the 1.0d firmware it enabled overclocking (i got it to 2.1ghz on an atom!) and i put an extra 1gb of ram in it and i ran a program called "GMA booster" that overclocks the intel GMA 950 graphics card (i assume u'll have it) up to 4x the performance. i played oblivion on my netbook at 34fps (on power, 20fps on battery) if you want GMA booster i can loan u my serial to test it out with. i sold the netbook so i no longer use the program beat that haha
no, i dont need pre built crap anymore. ill use a retail snow leopard build usind the 132-BOOT loader then install chameleon rc4. i've chosen hardware with good compatibility and i'll collect any extra kexts that i'd need. ideneb is VERY helpful to noobs starting out with hackintoshes, but its limited... real builds are superior in every way
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/3632/screenshot20100427at194.png thats right bitches, mac dual screening 2, im watching avatar in HD on my second monitor its just like Pocahontas... i feel like a kid again