Slidell

McFarlane toys accidently leaked two new enmies for Halo 4. Called the Watcher, and The crawler. http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae329/SlidellofOlde/1336881336728.jpg

We would have been there almost three times over now if everyone who viewed posted. 2196.

http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae329/SlidellofOlde/1336426920078.jpg Just Dance 4 Killer Freaks from Outer Space Marvel Super Heroes Metro: Last Light Monsters Party New Super Mario Brothers Mii Ninja Gaiden 3 Rabbids Party Land Pikmin Raving Rabbids Rayman Legends Shield Pose Splinter Cell 6 Sports Connection Tekken Your Shape 2013 Zombie Aliens: Colonial Marines Batman: Arkham City Assassin's Creed Darksiders 2 Dirt 3 Formula 1 All Stars Game Party Ghost Recon Online Titles like "Monster Party" and other generic terms are placeholders http://www.joystiq.c...5-wii-u-titles/

Dayum Twam, you're twenty nine now? Congrats on being an adult. I knew you were older than me but I thought you were 23ish. Hang on, hang on, I have an idea. http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae329/SlidellofOlde/065.jpg I couldn't find a lighter, so you'll have to pretend blow it out, well, you'll have to pretend blow it out and pretend the candle's are on fire. Double pretend. Oh and hey, everything's pink like you, I assume you're pink in real life. Who knew making brownies today would pay off?

It means ant man, but I'm more curious as to whether or not he's making an ant man movie, or if he's just ******* with people.

http://i.imgur.com/56V9V.jpg

Look at some of the most successful, and critically acclaimed games out there, Call of Duty, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect. What do they all have in common? Big Publisher. Yearly releases/bi yearly releases Rushed dev times. Zero Innovation. (AC is a bit of an exception) But year, after year, they're rated 10/10 by every reviewer out there, why? Because gaming journalism is corrupt, not corrupt directly, it's not like EA actually goes to IGN with a burlap sack with a big dollar sign on it and says "Give Mass Effect 3 a 10/10." they're corrupt in a more discreet way. All of these sites survive on ad revenue, ads for games, there in lines the problem. By definition, that's a conflict of interest. They get money from a big publisher/dev for months advertising a game, they give it a bad review, the game company is less inclined to put ads up on their site in the future, they're less inclined to give them a game early, the site gets less hits, the site gets less ad revenue. The ME3 ending debacle showed just how corrupt gaming journalism is more than anything I can think of (except for that guy getting fired from gamespot). In no other medium are fans that are disappoint by a product demonized, almost universally by every site there is. All of the big sites, either didn't cover the story, gave it a passing mention, or attacked the fans. Across the board, and the only sites that were on the side of the fans were the smaller ones (Gamesradar) and sites not associated with gaming (Forbes). In no other medium is mediocrity rewarded like it is in the gaming industry. Transformers made a lot of money, lot's of people bought the dvds, went to see it in the theaters, whatever. But no critic gave it a great review, it didn't win any oscars, and no critic is attacking anyone who didn't like it and calling them entitled, or saying they're hurting Michael Bays artistic integrity by saying it's shit. That only happens with games, it's ******* embarrassing, and it's hurting the industry, because people don't want to investigate for themselves, they just want to be told how to feel. Whether it be videogames, politics, or religion. tldr; The gaming industry has been inadvertently set up to encourage mediocrity. That's me off my soapbox.

About three hours after they were voted worst company in America they released a statement saying they were getting scores of anti-gay hatemail. That's at best convenient, but more likely an incredibly childish defense mechanism.

I'm thinking gay.

So this is what a bleeding company looks like.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPCjIGyrtYc

The death of consoles.

Nothing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8uLT_EIJjs It's over, consoles are finished.

I think the bot has more post than I do. But can he win a T-Ball participation trophy? Ha, I think not.

Well, you got to remember, when Bungie made Reach, they weren't doing it because they wanted to, they were doing it because they had to. They made an agreement with Microsoft, we'll make X number of Halo games. Everyone at 343i wants to make Halo. I'm happy that they'll be giving Chief a personality this time around too, I don't really like the silent thing.

Yet another topic where the joke goes over everyones head.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrOIgxQ--Tc

No wait, this is. By the way, why do bots always like my posts?

*******, that's probably one of the worst attempts at hiding a spambot I've seen.

I think we've established it's a bot, just no one's done anything about it. Well this pretty much proves it right? No one could think this is a good idea.

http://media1.gameinformer.com/imagefeed/featured/microsoft/360slim/xbox360elite2156-610.jpg The Internet is swirling with rumors today about the graphics capability of Microsoft's next console. According to a report from Fudzilla published today, the power behind the next Xbox will be a PowerPC CPU married to a modified ATI Southern Islands 7000 series GPU. The code name for the 32nm chip is Oban, and the report says it's currently in production. The first run of these chips are being made for development kits only. Fudzilla's report suggests chips for consumer consoles will go into production by the end of the year, suggesting we won't see Microsoft's new console until 2013 at the earliest. Meanwhile, IGN says the GPU will be based on the 6000 series instead, akin to the Radeon HD 6670. So far, Microsoft isn't commenting on any of the rumors. Via gameinformer.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwn8992-BY0 HNNNG

Dios Mio man.

It's called Warm Bodies. Synopsis http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae329/SlidellofOlde/fdlsf.jpg http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae329/SlidellofOlde/why.jpg http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae329/SlidellofOlde/why2.jpg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31g0YE61PLQ That will have to suffice in summing up my reaction to this. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1588173/