Jump to content

  •  

  • iBotModz CBox


    Photo

    Halo Reach Opinion Poll


    • Please log in to reply
    47 replies to this topic

    Poll: Halo Reach Opinion Poll (26 member(s) have cast votes)

    Halo Reach Beta Oppinion

    1. Awesome! i (14 votes [53.85%] - View)

      Percentage of vote: 53.85%

    2. Its good :) (8 votes [30.77%] - View)

      Percentage of vote: 30.77%

    3. Not a Fan (1 votes [3.85%] - View)

      Percentage of vote: 3.85%

    4. Disappointed... (2 votes [7.69%] - View)

      Percentage of vote: 7.69%

    5. Over-Powerd Rubbish (1 votes [3.85%] - View)

      Percentage of vote: 3.85%

    Vote Guests cannot vote

    #41 gruntmods

    gruntmods

      Commander Grade 2

    • Donors+

    • 1,889 posts
    • Joined: 26-November 08
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Unknown World

    Posted 10 May 2010 - 04:24 AM

    after playing Fallout 3, GoW, and many other games, Halo 3's graphics look like clay and the spartans look like clay peopl

    it just looked too fake

    for Reach, it looks much better
    but I think its what H3 should of looked like

    honestly, they should make a new xbox so that developer arn`t strained using 4 year old tech.
    Sure games CAN be made very high quality like this now, but its incredibly hard and has a performance penalty.

    Edited by gruntmods, 10 May 2010 - 04:25 AM.


    #42 test10

    test10

      Private Grade 2

    • Members+

    • 51 posts
    • Joined: 06-October 09
    • Gender:Male

    Posted 10 May 2010 - 08:23 AM

    Most developers can only take advantage of a console after years of it being out. Imagine a brand new home. You have 24 hours to give a tour, you will know next to nothing. 72 hours later you will have a better idea. It relates to video game development. Developers learn more efficient methods and other ways to accomplish things the longer they have the console.

    Consoles should be on a 8-12 year release cycle at this day in age.

    #43 Quinn

    Quinn

      Colonel Grade 3

    • Global Mods

    • 2,323 posts
    • Joined: 29-August 07
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Canada

    Posted 10 May 2010 - 01:17 PM

    I think most 360 graphics suck. But I guess thats just me.
    But mind you, I play games like Fallout 3 with over 10 gigs of textures replaced.

    #44 Randomrocket

    Randomrocket

      Gunnery Sergeant Grade 2

    • VIP

    • 796 posts
    • Joined: 29-January 09
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Texas

    Posted 10 May 2010 - 02:54 PM

    honestly, they should make a new xbox so that developer arn`t strained using 4 year old tech.
    Sure games CAN be made very high quality like this now, but its incredibly hard and has a performance penalty.

    Didnt they estimate the 360 to live until 2015??

    That's a long time on just 512 MB of RAM!!!

    #45 iBotPeaches

    iBotPeaches

      General Grade 6

    • Owner

    • 6,570 posts
    • Joined: 29-July 07
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Kansas

    Posted 11 May 2010 - 06:07 AM

    Its not an operating system like a computer though. Most of your RAM on a computer is sucked up by a variety of things. A 360 does use it a lot more efficiently.

    #46 gruntmods

    gruntmods

      Commander Grade 2

    • Donors+

    • 1,889 posts
    • Joined: 26-November 08
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Unknown World

    Posted 11 May 2010 - 06:20 AM

    Didnt they estimate the 360 to live until 2015??

    That's a long time on just 512 MB of RAM!!!

    Then again, the PS3 has 256mb

    #47 matty0

    matty0

      Gunnery Sergeant Grade 3

    • Donors+

    • 888 posts
    • Joined: 15-April 08
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:United Kingdom, England

    Posted 11 May 2010 - 01:11 PM

    we're getting hung up on things that dont matter. the whole point of this thread is to discuss how good (or otherwise) reach is. not the inadequacies of the xbox 360.

    thats a conversation for another thread.

    #48 Randomrocket

    Randomrocket

      Gunnery Sergeant Grade 2

    • VIP

    • 796 posts
    • Joined: 29-January 09
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Texas

    Posted 11 May 2010 - 02:17 PM

    Its not an operating system like a computer though. Most of your RAM on a computer is sucked up by a variety of things. A 360 does use it a lot more efficiently.

    True. But a video game on my computer uses at least a GB of RAM. Just the program itself.

    And we do need to get back to the topic, but the thing is, we kind of were talking about Halo Reach. We're discussing why some people think it is "crappy". Which I dont think it is. The Reach game we have is a beta. Im not saying they did, but I think they had to tone down the graphics to get it to fit in the 1.15 GB that it did. I bet you guys that the final game will be epic. I just hope they don't rush it and leave out a bunch of features and unfixed bugs.

    Like MW2. Im not sure, but why did they leave on Global Thermonuclear war?? And remember all the bugs it had? It need like 4 patches or something like that. lol




    0 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users