Jump to content

  •  

  • iBotModz CBox


    Photo

    Fb build v 0.12 12625


    • Please log in to reply
    7 replies to this topic

    #1 jmdalmighty

    jmdalmighty

      Admin

    • VIP

    • 1,242 posts
    • Joined: 15-May 08
    • Gender:Female
    • Location:UK/ UR MUMS HOUSE (BURN)

    Posted 14 March 2011 - 07:46 PM

    Fbbuild v0.12 the Un-official release for Jasper and Falcon consoles by "E Nellie" and "Deep3r".

    This has been worked and has been explained in other topics the whole flaming story has been totally resolved in my opinion.

    This version of Fbbuild works for Jasper consoles only. The has no avatar support just like 12611 unless you install the avatar update all other consoles will have to wait. No planned release for other consoles yet. It's just a personal project that got out of hand and got leaked.

    Nothing special has been added I might just port Dashlaunch support just for the fun.

    I just finished porting the patches for Falcon consoles and here is the release and before flaming ask E Nellie he didn't send me this, I didn't even know he had them. :)


    Also please remember that this does not have Xbox LIVE.


    Features:


    No LIVE
    Extra No LIVE
    No Xbox LIVE
    You can't connect to XBL



    Don't waste Keyvaults.

    Download Fbbuild v1.2 - Here!

    Download Falcon patches - Here!



    Jasper and Falcon consoles only.

    Credits:
    E Nellie
    Deep3r


    As it turns out Dizzy got his patches from E Nellie for Falcon Mobos
    Click the spoiler

    Spoiler




    -Deep3r



    #2 halo3

    halo3

      Gunnery Sergeant Grade 1

    • Members+

    • 571 posts
    • Joined: 07-June 08
    • Gender:Male

    Posted 15 March 2011 - 04:13 PM

    i cant believe it, no1 wants jtags online, i know this isnt it but it is still a step closer unfortionatly

    #3 Quinn

    Quinn

      Colonel Grade 3

    • Global Mods

    • 2,323 posts
    • Joined: 29-August 07
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Canada

    Posted 15 March 2011 - 10:33 PM

    i cant believe it, no1 wants jtags online, i know this isnt it but it is still a step closer unfortionatly


    So you think that everyone should take them online? Please, do explain your reasoning, and please take into consideration the facts:
    • People will ruin games with hacking, the worst being infectious hacking
    • Legit players won't stand a damn chance
    • MS likes to banhammer everything, including your JTAG
    • You look like a douche for ruining other peoples game
    Okay, maybe the last one is a bit pointless, because I suspect many of you don't give a damn, but I digress.
    But seriously, being a PC gamer, hacking is something that I have to combat every time I play COD etc online. Its kinda shitty. Luckily we have VAC that blocks the shit out of hacks ;) (but only after they become public/widely used)

    #4 Twis7eD

    Twis7eD

      Private Grade 2

    • Members+

    • 89 posts
    • Joined: 19-December 09

    Posted 15 March 2011 - 11:48 PM

    This rebooter is so pointless. The developer of it made it without LIVE enabled, but the only point of upgrading from the 12611 kernel to this kernel would be the ability to go on LIVE. Basically the developer is saying "I blocked LIVE for you guys, but let's see how long it takes someone else to re-enable it". It's just making it a lot easier for idiots to get back on LIVE.

    #5 halo3

    halo3

      Gunnery Sergeant Grade 1

    • Members+

    • 571 posts
    • Joined: 07-June 08
    • Gender:Male

    Posted 25 March 2011 - 01:28 PM

    So you think that everyone should take them online? Please, do explain your reasoning, and please take into consideration the facts:

    • People will ruin games with hacking, the worst being infectious hacking
    • Legit players won't stand a damn chance
    • MS likes to banhammer everything, including your JTAG
    • You look like a ****** for ruining other peoples game
    Okay, maybe the last one is a bit pointless, because I suspect many of you don't give a damn, but I digress.
    But seriously, being a PC gamer, hacking is something that I have to combat every time I play COD etc online. Its kinda shitty. Luckily we have VAC that blocks the shit out of hacks ;) (but only after they become public/widely used)

    Idk how i can make myself any clearer that I don't want them online. Did you even remotly read what i said? Look again and read it closely, I said "no1 wants jtags online" and "i know this isnt it but it is still a step closer unfortionatly". As i stated above i clearly dont want them online your right they ruin online gameplay, how in the world did u think I did want them online based off what i said?

    #6 Quinn

    Quinn

      Colonel Grade 3

    • Global Mods

    • 2,323 posts
    • Joined: 29-August 07
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Canada

    Posted 25 March 2011 - 03:15 PM

    Idk how i can make myself any clearer that I don't want them online. Did you even remotly read what i said? Look again and read it closely, I said "no1 wants jtags online" and "i know this isnt it but it is still a step closer unfortionatly". As i stated above i clearly dont want them online your right they ruin online gameplay, how in the world did u think I did want them online based off what i said?


    First things first, it may be possible that your (severe lack of) spelling skill could have confused me. And yes, you could have made yourself a lot more clear:
    "i cant believe it, no1 wants jtags online, i know this isnt it but it is still a step closer unfortionatly"
    "I cant (should be can't) believe it, no1 (should be no one) wants JTAGs online" To me, that looks like you cannot believe that people don't want them online, therefor implying that you do want them online.
    "i (Should be a capitol) know this isn't it but it still a step closer unfortionatly" (Should be spelled "unfortunately") Again, to me, this looks like you're saying that this release is a step closer to having them offline only.



    Served?

    #7 gruntmods

    gruntmods

      Commander Grade 2

    • Donors+

    • 1,889 posts
    • Joined: 26-November 08
    • Gender:Male
    • Location:Unknown World

    Posted 26 March 2011 - 09:46 AM

    First things first, it may be possible that your (severe lack of) spelling skill could have confused me. And yes, you could have made yourself a lot more clear:
    "i cant believe it, no1 wants jtags online, i know this isnt it but it is still a step closer unfortionatly"
    "I cant (should be can't) believe it, no1 (should be no one) wants JTAGs online" To me, that looks like you cannot believe that people don't want them online, therefor implying that you do want them online.
    "i (Should be a capitol) know this isn't it but it still a step closer unfortionatly" (Should be spelled "unfortunately") Again, to me, this looks like you're saying that this release is a step closer to having them offline only.



    Served?

    Better be careful, idiocy is contagious.

    #8 halo3

    halo3

      Gunnery Sergeant Grade 1

    • Members+

    • 571 posts
    • Joined: 07-June 08
    • Gender:Male

    Posted 27 March 2011 - 09:30 AM

    First things first, it may be possible that your (severe lack of) spelling skill could have confused me. And yes, you could have made yourself a lot more clear:
    "i cant believe it, no1 wants jtags online, i know this isnt it but it is still a step closer unfortionatly"
    "I cant (should be can't) believe it, no1 (should be no one) wants JTAGs online" To me, that looks like you cannot believe that people don't want them online, therefor implying that you do want them online.
    "i (Should be a capitol) know this isn't it but it still a step closer unfortionatly" (Should be spelled "unfortunately") Again, to me, this looks like you're saying that this release is a step closer to having them offline only.



    Served?

    you still missread waht i said :thumbdown:




    0 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users